Some Old Computers
This page is really a bit of fun: just details of some of the really old (2nd generation)
machines I have known. Other historical sites you may want to visit include:
Some old British Machines
What follows is a summary of some British architectures from the 1960's: I give them in
(approximate) chronological order. They share a common philosophy (if not a common architecture),
apparently deriving from the vacuum-tube designs of the early 1950's. None of these machines
used integrated logic in any form: everything was discrete transistors, and in some cases,
ferrite-core logic.
This machine was introduced around 1962. It was also the first machine I myself ever wrote
code for, in 1968!
Built using discrete transistor and ferrite-core technology, and using bit-serial logic. Word
length was 39 bits. This architecture seems to have originated in the Ferranti Pegasus, a
vacuum-tube machine from 1956.
Sizes & weights (inches, pounds)
Central Processor |
66x56x16 |
680 |
Extra 4096 words store |
33x56x16 |
250 |
Power Unit |
33x56x16 |
380 |
19-bit instructions were packed 2 to a word, with the 39th bit acting as a "modifier" on the
second instruction. The effect of this was to add the content of the memory location addressed
in the first instruction to the whole of the second: this was the only computed-address
mechanism available (short of self-modifying code). The modification acted on the opcode bits
as well as the address: this was the basis of many truly incomprehensible coding tricks!
Half-page Algol programs used to take half an hour to compile & execute. Amazingly, the Algol
compiler and run-time package (developed under the direction of
C. A. R. Hoare) would fit in 8192
words of memory. Standard IO was 5-track paper tape, with magnetic tape an option. The mag-tape
was termed "film": the tape format actually being identical to 35mm movie film.
Hardware floating-point was available, with a 39-bit floating-point number, and a (binary)
exponent range of +/-256.
With a maximum memory capacity of 8192 words, 13 address bits were used. The remaining 6 bits
were available for the opcode, and were represented as 2 octal digits.
Instructions
The content of the single 39-bit accumulator is denoted by a, and that of the addressed
location by n. a' and n' denote the values after the operation. N
denotes the address part of the instruction.
Groups 0 - 3 (Arithmetic) 576uS
Group 0 |
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
Group 3 |
Code |
a' |
n' |
Code |
a' |
n' |
Code |
a' |
n' |
Code |
a' |
n' |
00 |
a |
n |
10 |
n |
a |
20 |
a |
a |
30 |
n |
n |
01 |
-a |
n |
11 |
-n |
a |
21 |
a |
-a |
31 |
n |
-n |
02 |
n+1 |
n |
12 |
n+1 |
a |
22 |
a |
n+1 |
32 |
n |
n+1 |
03 |
a&n |
n |
13 |
a&n |
a |
23 |
a |
a&n |
33 |
n |
a&n |
04 |
a+n |
n |
14 |
a+n |
a |
24 |
a |
a+n |
34 |
n |
a+n |
05 |
a-n |
n |
15 |
a-n |
a |
25 |
a |
a-n |
35 |
n |
a-n |
06 |
0 |
n |
16 |
0 |
a |
26 |
a |
0 |
36 |
n |
0 |
07 |
n-a |
n |
17 |
n-a |
a |
27 |
a |
n-a |
37 |
n |
n-a |
Group 4 (Jumps) 288uS
Code |
Code |
Condition |
40 |
44 |
Unconditional
|
41 |
45 |
If a negative |
42 |
46 |
If a zero |
43 |
47 |
If oflo. (clear flag) |
40..43 |
Jump to 1st half of word |
44..47 |
Jump to 2nd half of word |
Group 5 (Shifts)
Double-length shifts use a and ar (the "auxiliary accumulator")
Code |
Function |
50 |
Arithmetic right shift N places |
51 |
Logical right shift N places, clear ar |
52 |
Multiply (double-length product) |
53 |
Multiply (single-length product), ar:= 0 |
54 |
Shift left, double-length, N places |
55 |
Shift left, single length, ar:= 0 |
56 |
Divide a:ar by n, ar:= 0 |
57 |
a:= ar |
Group 6 (Floating-point & miscellaneous functions)
Code |
Function |
60 |
a:= a+n |
61 |
a:= a-n |
62 |
a:= n-a |
63 |
a:= a*n |
64 |
a:= a/n |
65 |
Convert integer in A to floating-point |
66 |
Interrupt return (503 only) |
67 |
Modify next instruction by adding LS 19 bits of n (503 only) |
Group 7 (Input/Output)
70 |
Read panel key-switches to a |
71 |
Read character from device N to a |
72 |
Output 39-bit word from a to device N |
73 |
Write the address of this instruction to location N |
74 |
Output character to device N |
75 |
Input 39-bit word from device N to a |
76 |
Setup hardware for block transfer (503 only) |
77 |
Initiate DMA operation (503 only) |
Elliott 503
Introduced in the mid-60s, the 503 was a fully parallel replacement for the 803, running some
60 times faster. Group 0 instructions, for example, took 7.2uS. This machine, fully optioned
up, would have weighed several tons.
Sizes & weights (inches, pounds)
Logic Cabinet |
78x38x24 |
1000 |
Main Store cabinet |
78x38x24 |
850 |
Power Cabinet |
78x38x24 |
1350 |
Full Controller cabinet |
78x38x24 |
1000 |
Half Full Controller cabinet |
78x38x24 |
750 |
Peripheral Services cabinet |
78x38x24 |
1200 |
A little exercise
Just for fun, here's a stock bit of code (a subroutine entry/exit sequence) for these machines.
Do you see what's happening (tip: the "/" operator between the instructions invokes the "modify"
function):
. |
1st half |
. |
2nd half |
Label |
Code |
Operand |
Modify |
Code |
Operand |
caller |
73 |
SUBR |
: |
40 |
SUBR+1 |
..... |
SUBR: |
00 |
0 |
: |
00 |
0 |
subroutine code..... |
return |
22 |
SUBR |
/ |
40 |
0 |
You can jump here for an explanation.
This machine was originally designed for a British military project, and spawned a series of
military and civilian derivatives. The basic machine fitted in a desk 37 x 26 x 43 inches,
weighing 470lb. It could be likened to a 503 cut in half: the word-length is 18 bits, and
accommodates a single instruction. Most instructions executed in around 20uS. The bit
assignment within the word was:
Address |
13 bits |
Opcode |
4 bits |
Modifier |
1 bit |
|
|
Like the 503, address space was 8192 words, with extra memory accessible by paging. Being
designed for real-time applications, the 903 featured 4 interrupt priority levels. Separate
S (program counter) and B (modifier) registers for each level were mapped into
the first 8 memory locations. Unlike the 503, the "modifier" did not affect the operand of the
previous instruction, rather the modifier (here designated B) was added to the address
part of the instruction. The B register was loaded by Instruction 0.
Instruction codes (notation as above, with B & Q added)
Code |
Function |
0 |
b:= n; q:= n |
1 |
a:= a+n |
2 |
a:= n-a; q:= n |
3 |
n:= q |
4 |
a:= n |
5 |
n:= a |
6 |
a:= a & n |
7 |
Jump to N if a=0 |
8 |
Jump to N unconditionally |
9 |
Jump to N if a<0 |
10 |
n:= n+1 |
11 |
Store program counter in N |
12 |
A:Q:= a*n This multiply used fractional notation |
13 |
a:= A:Q/n This divide used fractional notation |
14 |
Shift A:Q left or right N places (N signed) |
15 |
Miscellaneous: I/O, interrupt return, etc. |
Singer System-10
Being designed in the US, this machine wouldn't normally rate a place on this page. However
it is so unusual that it deserves mention somewhere on the Web, and no-one else seems to have
done so. So here it is, on its own page. This is put together
from memory, so there may be errors. Corrections & additions are welcome.
Back to Home Page
Couldn't figure it out? OK, step by step:
- 73 SUBR writes the address of this instruction in SUBR (that's the all-zero
location that starts the subroutine).
- 40 SUBR+1 now we jump to the (first half of the) instruction following the SUBR
location: this will be the first live instruction of the subroutine.
- 22 SUBR this is the return instruction. We begin by incrementing the stored value,
so it now points after the 73 instruction that stored its address. That is, it
now points at the instruction we want to return to. We then modify the next instruction.
- / 40 0 this instruction looks like a jump to zero. But it was modified by the previous
instruction, which added the (incremented) content of SUBR to the instruction. Since that
would be a 13-bit memory address, the effect is to change the jump target to the required
return point, as required.
Of course, 00 SUBR / 40 1 would have returned just as well (wouldn't it?)